Implementation of the New York Convention - Judicial Perspective (speech)

Event: The Dawn of International Arbitration in the South Pacific: Regional International Arbitration Conference

Implementation of the New York Convention - Judicial Perspective (speech)

13 February 2018

Author / Speaker:

Anthony Harold Cumberland Thomas (A.H.C.T.) Gates, Supreme Court of Fiji - Email the author | Other materials by the author

View Document

Chief Justice Anthony Harold Cumberland Thomas (A.H.C.T.) Gates expressed appreciation for the assistance offered by ADB, UNCITRAL and other institutions in encouraging arbitration developments in the South Pacific region. He highlighted the need for judges in the region to be ready, should they be called upon to act in relation to an arbitration dispute. He also mentioned the Fiji High Court (Amendment) Rules 2018, which would bring a new Order 74 on international arbitration.

Chief Justice Gates added that despite the obvious advantages of international arbitration, the South Pacific island states remain averse to any proposal that would remove their jurisdiction to rule on cases they would normally decide on. Nonetheless, courts should enforce agreements, including arbitration agreements. Alternative dispute resolution methods, including arbitration and mediation, which can be conducted by the Fiji Mediation Centre, can resolve conflicts better and boost the prosperity of the South Pacific countries.

Geographical Focus:

Subregional- Pacific

Type of Content:

Learning Event

Disclaimer

The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.