Viet Nam's Poor Gains from Participatory Agriculture Research and Extension


Viet Nam's Poor Gains from Participatory Agriculture Research and Extension

01 April 2014
Author / Speaker: 

View Cases

The agriculture sector in Viet Nam was highly fragmented, with low investments and ineffective linkage among research, extension services, and support facilities. Traditional top-down approach had also led to the sector’s failure to tap local farming know-how. This knowledge showcase illustrates how engaging poor farmers in improving agriculture productivity and incomes can yield successful results.

When Viet Nam joined the World Trade Organization in 2007, it opened itself up to stiffer competition. This highlighted the need to improve the country’s agriculture science and technology (AST). To assist Viet Nam in this endeavor, ADB implemented a project that adopted a bottom-up approach to improving the quality and diversity of the country’s produce. It also worked to enhance productivity and technology development.

The project team asked poor farmers to identify the most-deserving beneficiaries and their most urgent needs. From the farmers’ inputs, the project invited potential researchers—in an open bidding process—to submit proposals to respond to these needs. This removed the traditional monopoly of extension offices and allowed farmer groups, civil society, and other stakeholders access to research funds. New curriculum covering better use of natural resources, climate change, and new agricultural technologies were offered to farmers.

The project already shows signs of early impact achievement. By linking training, research, and extension services, the AST project was able to foster natural resource management that the poor can participate in, with practical and sustainable results.

Geographical Focus: 
Viet Nam
Type of Content: 
Project Stories


The views expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.